An advisor expected that a graduate student would always be "on call" and "knew how to keep us close by threatening our future". Another student left her program after her advisor told her She "didn't think right"; for a while she waited for tables instead of studying engineering. The abusive advisor to a third student wrote a negative reference letterto thwart the student's efforts to better adapt to another program.
All three students gave their testimonials as part of a campaign by graduates of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to secure transition funding for those trying to leave an abusive counseling relationship. The campaign was successful: L. Rafael Reif, recently President of MIT announced A new program that students and administrators alike hope will put an end to such stories.
Under the programStudents who start on March 9 in doctoral and combined master's and doctoral programs at MIT are guaranteed one semester independent of a consultant financingThis can take the form of a scholarship, teaching assistant or research assistant. This one-semester period is designed to give students time to make long-term agreements with a new consultant or lab while ensuring they don't miss a paycheck.
In a broader sense, however, the program is about closing a power imbalance between graduate students and their advisors, said Kara Rodby, Ph.D. Mechanical engineering candidate and co-organizer of the PhD coalition behind the campaign. “There is such a refusal to validate student experiences as abuse, and instead it becomes behavior – isolating students from other resources, threatening students, having absurd expectations of their time, expectations of data falsification, terrible security conditions etc. – chalked as & # 39; advisory style & # 39; ", she said.
This is why Rodby and Rejust Injustice through Student Empowerment – or RISE, as the campaign is called – decided to include transitional funding in a broader framework List of demands The group was given out to MIT administrators last summer.
The idea wasn't new to the administrators either. A working group that dealt with performance dynamics at the institute – which Reif commissioned in response to a year 2018 report from the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine sexual harassment in academia – had recommended transition funding in February 2020 "for doctoral students who change their research groups and for postdocs who have to move to new positions due to complaints related to harassment".
And while individual departments and programs had long made it a habit of offering transitional funding on a case-by-case basis, the need for a more centralized process had become clear. The administrators welcomed the students' help in creating one, said Anantha P. Chandrakasan, dean of the MIT School of Engineering.
"This is almost a perfect template for how students and administrators could work together to accelerate and achieve our overall goals," said Chandrakasan, who co-led a working group on the issue that resulted from RISE with Cynthia Barnhart, MIT Chancellor -Composed of representatives, administrators and faculty members.
RISE members were responsible for drafting the proposal, which Barnhart said went through 26 drafts based on feedback from deans, department heads and administrators. "The students had a real need to be members of the table to help shape this," said Barnhart.
"I wasn't your responsibility"
As part of the preparation of the proposal, the working group heard from Nicholas S. Selby. In the fall of 2017, 13 months after graduating from MIT's engineering department, Selby's lead investigator fired him without warning during a regular meeting. The environment in the faculty member's laboratory is "unhealthy" and his working relationship with his supervisor is just as negative.
Selby had a research grant that would continue to pay him for the remainder of the semester, but he found himself with no financial support for the five months it would take to complete his master’s degree. His first attempts to get help were unsuccessful.
"My advisor's department was basically telling me that it was not their responsibility and that I just had to find out for myself," Selby recalled. A representative from MIT's Office of Graduate Education told Selby it would try to help but couldn't offer any certainties.
"It felt like I was asking people to do me a favor to help me finish my graduation program," said Selby. "Nobody I spoke to all over campus could guarantee that I would land on my feet."
Eventually, an administrative assistant in the mechanical engineering department took Selby under her wing and found a faculty member whom Selby hired as a teaching assistant for a semester so he could graduate. Selby then moved to another department at MIT to work under a new principal investigator for his doctorate.
But, said Selby, his story is unusual. He credits much of his recovery as a student to the administrative assistant, who went out of her way to help him. “This was an exception to the rule,” Selby said, “and the reason you speak to me, unlike someone who is not so lucky, is that people who are not so lucky are simple get kicked out. " from MIT and finding their own way and trying to find a job elsewhere. "
The campaign's success meant a lot to Selby, who said he no longer worries about other students getting into a crisis like his own.
"People who find themselves in these really traumatic and horrific situations will find it at least a little easier to pull themselves out of these situations," he said, "because … at least they'll be financially able to stand on theirs . " Feet for a semester as they try to put their lives back together. "
Offer other protective measures
A priority for RISE, Rodby said, was ensuring that students could apply for transitional funding through multiple avenues, not just in their own program, where departmental policies or student distrust could be "soft barriers". PhD students can apply for transitional funding through a coordinator in their own department or through the institute's Office of Graduate Education. Students also do not need to provide evidence of an unhealthy counseling relationship in order to receive transitional funding.
The policy also prevents a lengthy breakup process with a student's original advisor. While an investigator may ask a student to train successors or finalize dates before departure, those commitments are limited to 15 hours per week of a student's time for up to four weeks. And if a student is unfamiliar with this thesis, other arrangements can be made.
Students using transitional funding are also offered other protections, including flexibility with regard to study milestones and protection from retaliation. For example, if a student has concerns about soliciting a letter of recommendation from the original advisor, the Transition Support Coordinators will help find other faculty members to use as a reference.
In a second phase of the campaign, RISE hopes to be able to extend the guaranteed funding to students who change advisors for other, more harmless reasons – for example if their research interests change. The second phase will also develop a mechanism to track advisor changes and "provide appropriate responses to disruptive patterns and behaviors that these data reveal".
MIT does not currently keep detailed records of how often and for what reasons students switch counselors. Barnhart hopes that by ensuring that support is provided for students considering a move, MIT executives will have a better understanding of how common counseling problems arise.
"One of the things we don't know is how many students don't tell us they are in this situation," she said. "Empowering them to make changes when they feel they need one is a great motivation."